The biggest US bank failure since the 2008 financial crisis has created major uncertainty throughout the banking system – and it has heightened fraud risks for organisations across Australia and New Zealand. California regulators closed the prominent tech lender Silicon Valley Bank (SVB Banking Group) on 10 March, an unravelling with significant ramifications for the US tech sector and wider market.
Most crucially for those outside the US tech sector, fraudsters will be looking to capitalise on the chaos by duping tech companies’ customers into paying fraudulent accounts – organisations that bank with Silicon Valley Bank are already telling customers not to pay bills to that account.
As of this article’s publication, the US Treasury, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have announced that “depositors will have access to all of their money starting Monday, March 13. No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank will be borne by the taxpayer.”
The only certainty is that the story will continue to evolve and we’ll learn more about its ramifications over time. However, there are still risks around paying into these accounts unless advised otherwise. Many accounts will still be closed or taken over by other entities, and many companies will have already opened new accounts.
So here’s how to protect your organisation.
Finance professionals should be on high alert for account detail change requests.
Eftsure has blacklisted SVB bank account details as insolvent and provides protection against fraudulent attempts to change account details.
Whether or not you’re an Eftsure customer, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank is the sort of black swan event that proves the importance of robust callback controls and a cyber-crime strategy that aligns your financial controls with your cybersecurity measures.
Both US and Australian media have reported widely on Silicon Valley Bank’s disintegration, offering a variety of analyses and perspectives on the factors leading up to its collapse. You can read those in outlets like the AFR or Sydney Morning Herald.
Basically, Bloomberg’s Matt Levine explains the situation as the bank making a “huge concentrated bet on interest rates.” Since so many of its startup customers had ample cash, SVB instead invested in longer-dated fixed-income securities but, in a high-interest-rate environment, had to sell those securities at a loss. After venture capital firms begin expressing doubt about SVB’s stability, it wasn’t able to survive a bank run.
Visual Capitalist has provided a handy visual timeline below.
The collapse has sparked broader unease in the financial system. State regulators closed a second bank, Signature Bank of New York, whose depositors have also been promised protection from federal authorities.
It bears repeating that the situation is still unfolding, but the bottom line is this: uncertainty in the banking sector creates fertile ground for fraudsters and cyber-criminals. Finance professionals will need to stay on their toes as we learn more.
Each month, the team at Eftsure monitors the headlines for the latest accounts payable (AP) and security news. We bring you all …
Discover key insights from the OAIC report on data breaches, including the impact of human error and strategies for CFOs to protect their organisations.
Discover key trends from SXSW’s “Friend or Foe: Whose Side is AI on in the Digital Scam Wars?” and how AI is transforming both fraud prevention and execution.
Eftsure provides continuous control monitoring to protect your eft payments. Our multi-factor verification approach protects your organisation from financial loss due to cybercrime, fraud and error.
