What is MFA?
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is a security method that requires users to prove their identity using two or more distinct factors before accessing …
Smurfing is a money laundering technique where individuals break down large sums of money into smaller transactions to avoid detection by regulatory authorities. This illegal practice involves spreading out these smaller transactions across multiple accounts to stay below reporting thresholds and evade scrutiny by regulatory agencies.
Smurfing can have serious legal consequences and is considered a form of financial fraud. In this blog post, we explore the concept of smurfing, how it works, and how to prevent it.
Smurfing in the context of money laundering involves breaking down large sums of money into smaller, less suspicious amounts to evade regulatory reporting requirements. Criminals—in this case, called “smurfs”—employ this technique to evade detection by authorities and integrate illicit gains into the financial system without raising suspicion.
The process of smurfing unfolds through three stages:
Financial institutions and law enforcement agencies actively work to detect and prevent smurfing due to its detrimental impact on the integrity of the financial system and society as a whole. By understanding the intricacies of smurfing and implementing robust measures to combat it, authorities can mitigate the risks posed by this illicit activity and safeguard the integrity of the global financial infrastructure.
Smurfing and structuring are closely related concepts in the realm of financial crime: both involve the division of large sums of money into smaller transactions to circumvent regulatory oversight. However, even though they share similarities in their modus operandi, there are fundamental distinctions between the two practices.
While both smurfing and structuring involve dividing substantial sums of cash into smaller transactions, their key differences lie in their goals and methods. Smurfing entails breaking down a large amount of money into smaller transactions that fall below the reporting threshold set by regulatory bodies. The aim of smurfing is to evade detection by financial institutions, which are mandated to report cash transactions surpassing a specific limit.
On the other hand, structuring involves fragmenting larger deposits into smaller sums to circumvent reporting requirements. For example, an individual might opt to make ten deposits of $5,500 each instead of a single $55,000 deposit, thus avoiding triggering the deposit reporting mandate. Structuring primarily seeks to escape scrutiny from regulatory agencies while adhering to standard reporting thresholds outlined in anti-money laundering (AML) protocols.
Unlike smurfing, structuring may not require the involvement of multiple parties or accounts. Often, it revolves around a single entity making numerous deposits just below the reporting threshold. However, both smurfing and structuring are considered illicit activities, violating AML regulations and carrying severe legal consequences.
Smurfing is a particularly attractive money laundering tactic in various industries, including:
Preventing smurfing requires solid AML measures, especially in industries prone to such activities. Despite regulations mandating advanced customer due diligence, non-compliance cases are increasing annually.
Key prevention strategies involve adhering to five key pillars of AML. This includes appointing a compliance officer, conducting risk assessments, establishing internal controls and AML policies, continuously monitoring and auditing AML programs, and implementing Customer Due Diligence (CDD) practices.
Another crucial aspect is adopting a risk-based approach. This entails identity verification through strong Know Your Customer (KYC) measures tailored to specific industry risks. Companies should conduct thorough risk assessments to prioritize vulnerabilities and allocate resources efficiently.
Customer risk profiling is essential, categorizing customers into different risk levels and applying enhanced due diligence (EDD) to high-risk individuals or entities. Additionally, implementing real-time transaction monitoring systems is vital for flagging and investigating suspicious transactions, which is crucial for detecting smurfing activities.
References:
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is a security method that requires users to prove their identity using two or more distinct factors before accessing …
Imposter scams are a type of fraud where scammers pretend to be trusted individuals, companies, or government agencies to deceive victims into …
Accounts payable fraud is a deceptive practice that exploits vulnerabilities in a company’s payment processes. It occurs when individuals—whether employees, vendors or …
Eftsure provides continuous control monitoring to protect your eft payments. Our multi-factor verification approach protects your organisation from financial loss due to cybercrime, fraud and error.